Hofschulte v. Doe
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Action at Law for False Imprisonment. Answer filed. General demurrer to answer. Demurrer overruled.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, District Judge.
Tbis is an action for false imprisonment. Tbe complaint declares on tbe official bond of tbe defendant Fred H. Doe as marshal of the town of Ferndale, in Humboldt county, Cal., and against tbe other defendants Charles A. Doe and John W. Kemp as sureties, to recover damages for a breach of tbe conditions of the bond. Tbe complaint contains three counts. They all allege that at tbe times mentioned in tbe complaint the plaintiff was and is an alien, and a subject of tbe king of Prussia, and that the defendants were and are citizens of tbe state of California. Tbe first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Stoutenburgh v. HennickSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Trammell v. Town of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bohri v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
- Giese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Reilly v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Peterson v. MerrittIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Snyder v. HausheerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.