Legal Opinion
State v. Mullien
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 2013No. AC 33490PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The defendant, Robert Mullien III, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1) and assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence and a confession obtained during a search of his home; and (2) granted the state’s motion to amend the information after the trial had commenced. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The state charged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CrespoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Enrique F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. BrundageConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. PelusoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.