Ohio Credit Corp. v. Brigham

This cause came on to be heard, upon the merits, by the court, without the intervention of a jury, upon the pleadings and the testimony of both parties. The controversy involves a bill of $388.75 allegedly due and owing the plaintiff, the assignee of an employment agency, from the defendant for whom said employment agency allegedly found a job, which he (the defendant) accepted.

1. The Facts

The evidence tended to show that the defendant entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff’s assignor, the Helen Russell Personnel Agency, whereby he agreed to pay a service charge based upon the…