Legal Opinion

(HC) Audinette v. Castellanos

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03169Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EZYKEL AUDINETTE, No. 2:24-cv-3169 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 CASTELLANOS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMNEDATION 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without an attorney, who has filed a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ECF No. 1, and requests to proceed in forma 19 pauperis, ECF No. 6. This matter is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the 20 Rules Governing 2254 Cases. 21 I. Screening Standard 22 In screening…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API