Legal Opinion

Ross v. . Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PROCEEDING supplementary to execution, heard on appeal from the judgment of the Cleric of the Superior Court of Yanoe county, before Boykin, J., at Chambers, on the 14th April, 1896. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice ClarK. From his Honor’s judgment appointing a receiver, etc., the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The plaintiff sued for the recovery of specific articles and money constituting a fund which had been conveyed to the plaintiff by the defendant. The jury found upon issues submitted to them that no specific articles were detained by the defendant, but that she had three hundred dollars of the money of the specific fund which she should have delivered to the plaintiff. The verdict was made a part of the judgment, which decreed that the plaintiff should recover of the defendant $300, with interest “ according to the verdict.”

Upon supplemental proceedings it was found as a fact that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. . ChichesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. QuickAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API