Harris County Water Control & Improvement District 99 v. Duke
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.
This appeal arises from a suit to collect delinquent ad valorem taxes brought against the appellees by Harris County Water Control and Improvement District number 99. Following a bench trial before an appointed tax master, the trial court ruled in favor of the District, and awarded it delinquent taxes, penalties, and interest. The trial court also awarded the District an amount of attorney’s fees equal to 10 percent of the total base taxes owed. In its sole point of error, the District contends that it is entitled to recoup a greater amount of its attorney’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Chevron Corp. v. RedmonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Centurion Planning Corp. v. Seabrook Venture II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Town & Country Suites, L.C. v. Harris Country Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Centurion Planning Corp., Inc. & Thomas C. Knickerbocker v. Seabrook Venture II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Kevin C. Loudon v. Victoria County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.