Legal Opinion

In re Laskin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1962No. 26345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, Senior District Judge.

The problem here presented is the construction of a promissory note:

$15,426.50 March 31 1959 Sixty Days after date_promise to pay to the order of INDUSTRIAL RAYON CORPORATION Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Six and 50/100----Dollars Payable at Cleveland, Ohio with interest at 6% per annum Value received

LASKIN BROS. OF PHILA. INC.

Harold Laskin

K-71730 Due May 30, 1959

Harold Laskin being bankrupt, the question here is whether this note constitutes the holder, Industrial Rayon Corporation, a creditor of the bankrupt. The referee held that the bankrupt was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Trust Co. v. CanevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  2. Dormont Savings & Trust Co. v. KommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Wanner v. Emanuel's Church of Evangelical Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Birmingham Iron Foundry v. RegnerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Harold Laskin, Bankrupt. Harold Laskin, Industrial Rayon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. Walton v. William H. Corby, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API