Ortiz-Medina v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for rehearing
2Per curiam
We grant the parties’ motions for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion, and substitute the following in its place.
Appellant appeals his convictions and sentences for armed kidnapping and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, claiming that they violate double jeopardy. We agree and reverse his conviction and sentence for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
A defendant’s double jeopardy rights are violated when he is convicted of two “[ojffenses which require identical elements of proof.” § 775.021(4)(b)l., Fla. Stat. In James v. State, 386 So.2d 890,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Capehart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
4Cited by4 opinions
- JORDAN PALMER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- MARCUS JAMES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Harris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Flagler County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Solomon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016