In re Rubin

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department on April 4, 1962. At *39all times relevant herein, the respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

By notice of motion dated September 11, 1991, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) suspending the respondent from the practice of law forthwith based upon uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct. The allegations of misconduct came to the attention of the DDC…