Legal Opinion

George Robert Petersen v. Walter Dunbar, Director of the California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1966No. 19867_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Seeking discharge in habeas corpus appellant challenges the validity of a felony sentence imposed upon him by the California state courts. He contends that such sentence amounts to an increase in a previously executed sentence and constitutes double jeopardy. At issue is the power of the state courts to impose a sentence of imprisonment following revocation of probation when, as a condition of probation, the defendant had already suffered jail detention.

Appellant, having pleaded guilty to the crime of uttering a bad check (California Penal Code, § 476a), was, on October…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. David William MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Hector Mendoza-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Scheidt v. MeredithDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  4. Gary Kennick v. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Howard v. CravenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API