Legal Opinion

Naparala v. Pella Corp.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 22, 2015No. Nos. 2:14-mn-00001-DCN, 2:14-mn-03465-DCNPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the court on defendant Pella Corporation’s (“Pella”) motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants Pella’s motion and dismisses ’ Naparala’s fraudulent concealment claim, unjust enrichment-claim, and breach of express warranty claim to the extent it is based on *887non-written warranties outside of Pella’s limited warranty.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Ted Naparala, Sr. (“Naparala”) began construction of his new home in September 2005. Def.’s Mot. Ex. 1, Naparala Depo. 19:24-25. He purchased…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API