Legal Opinion

Sampson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 25, 1901No. Naval Bounty, 1149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Reporters' statement of the case: The facts upon which this case is founded are set forth in the opinion of the court:

1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.

The officers and enlisted men of the U. S. S. Indiana, Iowa, Texas, and other vessels engaged in the battle off Santiago Bay, through their attorneys, have filed their joint motion herein asking the court to amend finding m heretofore found by striking therefrom the word Harvard, thereby excluding the officers and enlisted men attached to that vessel from sharing in the bountjr provided by Revised Statutes, section 4635, for the destruction of the Spanish vessels in that engagement.

The question as to the right of the Harvard and other vessels then in controversy to share in the bounty so…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sampson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API