Legal Opinion
Rando v. Government Employees Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 2, 2009No. 08-13247PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
In this diversity case, Appellants John and Gail Rando (the “Randos”) challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”) on the Randos’ automobile insurance claims against GEICO. After review and oral argument, we certify the determinative issue in this case to the Florida Supreme Court as outlined below.
I. BACKGROUND
In October 2004, the Randos moved from Delaware to Florida. Before the move, the Randos and their daughter Laura Rando had a single automobile insurance policy issued by GEICO. The policy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Mazzoni Farms, Inc. v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RoachSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- John Michael McGow v. Billy Joe McCurryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Coleman v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Trust Insurance Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Andreasen v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Rando v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Tudor Insurance Co. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2017
- Rockhill Ins. Co. v. Northfield Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.