Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Fair

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Wabaunsee District Court. Action by Higginbotham against Fair, to recover upon two promissory notes. July 13,1885, judgment was rendered for defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

W. P. Higginbotham sued Silvester Fair on two promissory notes alleged to have been executed by him on the 29th day of August, 1883, in favor of the Jacksonville Sulky Plow Works, or bearer, each for ¡§150, one of which was payable on the first day of May, 1884, and the other one the first day of June, 1884. Fair denied under oath that he executed the notes sued on, and this was the principal question upon which evidence was received. The trial resulted in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff brings the case here, alleging as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Snyder v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Clarkson v. HiblerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API