Pierson v. Canal Bank

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pkovosty, J.

Dames and amounts changed, the petition in this suit is identical with that in the suit of the same plaintiff against the Metropolitan Bank just decided, except that in the present suit there is not a demand for money on deposit. The defenses also are the same, except that in the present suit the warehouse receipts contained a better description of the cotton, the consignors’ marks on each bale being given.

It is claimed by the plaintiff that these consignors’ marks on each bale are not sufficient to identify the cotton, it being possible…