Legal Opinion
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Santa Barbara
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2012No. 10-4011PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This lawyer disciplinary proceeding brought against Michael S. Santa Barbara (hereinafter “Mr. Santa Barbara”) originated in a Statement of Charges issued against Mr. Santa Barbara by an investigative panel of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board (hereinafter *346“Board”).1 The Statement of Charges was filed with this Court by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (hereinafter “ODC”) on December 9, 2010. Following an evidentiary hearing on May 4 and 5, 2011, a Hearing Panel Subcommittee (hereinafter “HPS”) of the Board found that the proof presented in support of the charges reflected violations of several…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. DuesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ira M. HaughtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Alfred Joseph MunozWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Howard J. BlylerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Michael P. CookeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.