Legal Opinion

Smith v. New York State Department of Labor

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

James B. Canfield, J.

Petitioner seeks a declaration that respondents violated Civil Service Law § 72 by failing to hold a Civil Service Law § 72 (1) hearing, failing to provide petitioner with “written notice and explanations” and providing allegedly “inaccurate and misleading writings” to petitioner. Notwithstanding the absence of an administrative determination that her Civil Service Law § 72 (5) removal was improper or an application to return to work *196pursuant to Civil Service Law § 72 (2), petitioner also seeks an order reinstating her to the payroll, restoring all of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Petix v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. McShane v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  3. WILLIAMS, JOHN v. TROIANO, PETERAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Williams v. TroianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Williams v. TroianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API