Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Winnard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 1, 1907No. Gen. No. 13,338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill for accounting, etc. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Carpenter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

Appellee Netta J. Winnard entered into an agreement of co-partnership with William H. Clinton, appellant, to operate a “livery, feed and sale stable” in Chicago. Clinton was an engineer and had no experience in the business venture contemplated and Mrs. Winnard’s experience, if any, arises more by implication than proof, from the circumstance that her husband had unsuccessfully engaged in a like business. The articles of partnership among other things provided that Clinton was to purchase, pay for and own the real and personal property used in the firm business, and as compensation therefor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howe v. South Park CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fleece v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Dolese v. McDougallIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Little v. MerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judson v. First Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. House v. John Linn & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Seybert v. HoilesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  4. Ellis v. OrendorffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API