Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Ray Daniel and Patrick Henry Daniel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1992No. 91-1739PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURÍAM:
Charles and Patrick Daniel appeal their convictions for possession of goods stolen from an interstate shipment. Charles Daniel also appeals his conviction for structuring transactions to evade reporting requirements. They argue that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict them, that the trial court incorrectly limited their right to cross-examine the government’s chief witness, and that the trial court erred in giving one jury instruction and in refusing to give another. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the convictions.
I. BACKGROUND
Charles Daniel and Patrick Daniel,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Uriel Lara-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Brody v. GuercioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur FormannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Pedro Resio-TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.