Legal Opinion
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Bobby Berosini Ltd.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1995No. 21580Published
1Opinion of the Court
895 P.2d 1269 (1995)
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, a/k/a PETA, a Delaware Non-Profit Corporation; Performing Animal Welfare Society, a/k/a PAWS, a California Non-Profit Corporation; Jeanne Roush, Ottavio Gesmundo, and Pat Derby, Appellants,
v.
BOBBY BEROSINI, LTD., a Nevada Corporation, and Bohumil Berousek, a/k/a Bobby Berosini, Individually, Respondents.
No. 21580.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 22, 1995.
Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison & Howard and Robert D. Martin, Las Vegas, for appellant Gesmundo.
Hirschkop & Associates, Alexandria, VA, for appellants PETA, Roush and Gesmundo.
Watkiss &…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lovgren v. Citizens First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.