Washington National Bank v. Beatty
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported in 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 433.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dill, J.
This appeal from the court of chancery brings up for review a judgment dismissing the bill in a creditor’s action to set aside *253a voluntary conveyance of real estate. The bill charges the transaction as being “in violation of the statute entitled ‘An act for the prevention of frauds and perjuries/ approved March 27th, 1871.”
There is no element in the case, either by way of pleading or proof, that the complainant bank gave any credit to the defendant relying upon his ownership of the property in question. The answer, denying the material…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Marcus v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Franklin Nat. Bank v. FreileNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- KARO MARKETING v. Playdrome AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Baldwin v. KingstonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.