Legal Opinion
Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1996No. 1995-0301PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 578.] MAUZY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KELLY SERVICES, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.,
1996-Ohio-265.] Age discrimination—Phrase “Absent direct evidence of age discrimination” used in Kohmescher v. Kroger Co., construed—Plaintiff must show that she was “discharged” in order to establish a prima facia case of age discrimination under former R.C. 4101.17—When plaintiff alleging unlawful age discrimination chooses termination in lieu of transfer, the decision cannot be construed as an actual…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Miller v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Scanlon v. ScanlonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Mosley v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental RetardationOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Frick v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- N. Star Med. Research, L.L.C. v. KozlovichOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.