Legal Opinion

Seagen Inc v. Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 13, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01613Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 SEAGEN INC., CASE NO. C22-1613JLR 11 Petitioner, MINUTE ORDER v. 12 DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., 13 Respondent. 14 15 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable 16 James L. Robart: 17 Before the court is Petitioner Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) petition to vacate the award 18 (the “Award”) entered into in the arbitration between Seagen and Respondent Daiichi 19 Sankyo Co., Ltd. (“DSC”). (See generally Pet. (Dkt. # 1); Mem. (Dkt. ## 11 (sealed), 55 20 (redacted)).) In its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millmen Local 550, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio v. Wells Exterior TrimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. v. United Auto Workers Local 2244District Court, N.D. California · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API