Legal Opinion

Favrot v. Favrot

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1968No. 7129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant has filed a motion requesting that we direct the trial court reporter to prepare only the testimony taken on October 10 and 14 and November 16, 1966, exclusive of other testimony taken during previous hearings as directed by the trial judge. See Favrot v. Favrot, La.App., 200 So.2d 295 and La., 210 So.2d 316.

We stated in our original consideration of this matter at 200 So.2d 299 that certain portions of the objected testimony were necessary for us to consider the subject of the appeal. For reasons then stated we declined to issue a writ of mandamus.

This court will on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Favrot v. FavrotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Favrot v. FavrotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shanklin v. ShanklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Renfroe v. RenfroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Lilley v. LilleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API