Legal Opinion
Plains Metropolitan District v. Ken-Caryl Ranch Metropolitan District
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 2010No. 09CA0425PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CONNELLY.
This dispute, regarding the duty to construct neighborhood recreational facilities, involves adjoining metropolitan districts in Jefferson County, Colorado. The claims now before us were filed by Ken-Caryl Ranch Metropolitan District (KC) and three of its taxpayers against Plains Metropolitan District (Plains). After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Plains.
The principal dispute involves whether a service plan providing that Plains "will" build specified recreational facilities obligates Plains to build those facilities. We hold that it does, unless…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Plains Metro. Dist. v. KEN-CARYL RANCHColorado Court of Appeals · 2010