Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Leeds & Catlin Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. On motion to punish for contempt for violation of injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Aside from any other questions arising upon this motion as to disobedience of injunction order, I am entirely satisfied from the proofs that defendant, not only in the instances set forth in complainant’s moving papers, but in very many other instances, has manufactured and sold the records of claim 35 with the intent that they should be used in combination with the other elements of that claim in machines other than “mechanical feed.” Indeed, it is difficult to escape the conviction that the larger part of defendant’s sales were contrived by it to enable the owners of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis Electrical Works v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- American Graphophone Co. v. LeedsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Duplex Phonograph Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1909
- McIlhenny Co. v. BulliardDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1928
- American Graphophone Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. HoschkeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.