Legal Opinion

Kenemer v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1942No. 29579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Where an action is dismissed for want of prosecution on motion of defendant’s counsel, on the ground that when the case was called for trial the plaintiff did not answer present and ready for trial, the judgment of the court refusing to reinstate the case will not be held to be an abuse of discretion, even where it occurs fifteen minutes after the dismissal, where it is not made to appear in the bill of ex-eeptions why the plaintiff was not present and ready for trial on the call of the case and where there is no other reason why the ease should have been reinstated except the fact of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Bishop v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Platen v. Ordinary of Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Riden v. Commercial Credit PlanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Walker v. Columbus InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API