Legal Opinion

Uran v. Uran

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William C. Hecht, Jr., J.

This is an application by a beneficiary of an inter vivos trust, created February 5, 1952, to compel the trustees (1) to pay the net income of the trust to petitioner and (2) to file an accounting.

The trust indenture provides that the trustees “ shall collect and receive the income * * * and after deducting therefrom *1070all proper charges and expenses, shall pay the- same to the beneficiary thereof * * * until she reaches the ages hereinafter stated, or until her death, whichever event shall first occur ” (italics supplied). The beneficiary referred to is the present…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. In re Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Matter of Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co. v. MomandNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MegrueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. In re the Accounting of GilchristNew York Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. In re the Accounting of KassoverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  3. In re the Estates of Brush & BrushNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  4. Buck v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API