Legal Opinion

Sweeten v. Sneddon

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 7, 1971No. NC 49-70PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

This case involves questions relating to the necessity of convening a three-judge court, the propriety of a class action in such a case as this, whether the named plaintiff has standing at this time to raise, either by injunctive or declaratory action proceedings, constitutional issues growing out of a state court proceeding, and, if so, whether the refusal by a state court judge to appoint counsel for plaintiff in a misdemeanor case violated any constitutional right.

Jurisdictionally founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4),1 claim is made of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. David Wulp v. John H. Corcoran, City Manager, City of Cambridge, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. Pugh v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Hopson v. SchillingDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1976
  4. Robert John Morgan, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles A. Wofford, as Judge of the Superior Court of Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Sweeten v. SneddonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API