Legal Opinion

State v. Stickney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2004No. C0202-31067; A118290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant, who was convicted of possession of a controlled, Schedule II, substance ORS 475.992, appeals, assigning error to (1) the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress; and (2) the sentencing court’s imposition of a condition of probation, pursuant to ORS 137.076, requiring defendant to provide a blood or buccal sample for DNA typing purposes. We reject the first assignment of error without discussion. We reject the second assignment of error for the reasons set out in State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Mitchell, 130 Or App 134, 880 P2d 958 (1994), aff'd by an equally divided court, 325 Or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StickneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API