Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided May 26, 1993No. CA 92-885Published
1Opinion of the Court
854 S.W.2d 356 (1993)
42 Ark.App. 90
Robert L. GARDNER and Betty Ann Gardner, Appellants,
v.
Joe ROBINSON, Sr., Appellee.
No. CA 92-885.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II.
May 26, 1993.
Audrianna Grisham, Little Rock, for appellants.
ROGERS, Judge.
Robert and Betty Ann Gardner appeal from a decree granting their request for quiet title but denying their claim for damages for conversion. On appeal, appellants contend that the chancellor erred in refusing to award damages for conversion. We find merit in their argument and reverse.
On June 12, 1991, appellants filed a complaint in the chancery…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- B & F ENGINEERING, INC. v. CotroneoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- France v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Clark v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Harrison v. WeisbrodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.