S. S. Sleeper & Co. v. World's Fair Banquet Hall Co.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The appellants are partners, and we follow the irregular practice of the parties here in using the firm name, instead of pursuing the course laid down by Chitty, 1 Ch. Pl. 230, Ed. 1888.

The appellants were plaintiffs, and sued the appellees by attachment. Much of the abstract and briefs is occupied with the proceedings at the circuit on the attachment, ,but which do not concern us on this appeal, because, the action itself being misconceived, no errors upon the attachment, which, though original, is yet in legal effect only…