Legal Opinion

Mulvihill v. Frohmiller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuchwalter, P. J.

The action was for damages to an automobile, and was brought in the municipal court of Cincinnati. In the bill of particulars, plaintiff stated that the defendants, Edward Mulvihill and Charles Gill, were partners, doing business as Mulvihill & Company; that the plaintiff was the owner of an Oakland touring car, and that on the day in question his wife was driving said automobile westwardly on Madison road; that, when crossing the intersection at Madison road and Cleinview avenue an automobile owned by the defendants, and driven by their servant, acting within the scope of his authority,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scharff v. LevineOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API