Legal Opinion
United States v. Pizzarusso
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 1939No. Civ. No. 62PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion made by the defendant to dismiss the amended complaint. The complaint in this action is as follows:
“The complaint of the plaintiff respectfully shows to this Court:
“1. The United States of America, the complainant herein, is a corporation sovereign.
“2. The defendant herein is a resident of the City of New Haven, in the State of Connecticut.
“3. On the Í3th day of June, 1936, Turner W. Battle, Assistant to the Secretary of Labor, being thereto duly authorized by law, issued a Department of Labor Warrant of Deportation No. 55916/412, directing the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States ex rel. Carapa v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Prentis v. ManoogianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Ex parte Fong Chow OiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Principe v. AultDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
- Bongiovanni v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- United States ex rel. De Cicco v. LongoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1942