Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Hayward

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff sues for a saw bill. The work was performed under a written contract, and the •questions involved chiefly relate to the construction to be given to the agreement. The material portions of the contract are as follows:

“ The party of the first part agrees to cut, saw, pile, •and cover up after being sawed, the standing timber on [certain lands, describing them], for party of second part, •doing the same as per instructions given, from time to time, by the party of the second part.
“ It is mutually agreed the logs cut shall be scaled by a •competent scaler by Doyle and Scribner’s…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. Cleveland Sawmill & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API