Legal Opinion
Daggett v. Hayward
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff sues for a saw bill. The work was performed under a written contract, and the •questions involved chiefly relate to the construction to be given to the agreement. The material portions of the contract are as follows:
“ The party of the first part agrees to cut, saw, pile, •and cover up after being sawed, the standing timber on [certain lands, describing them], for party of second part, •doing the same as per instructions given, from time to time, by the party of the second part.
“ It is mutually agreed the logs cut shall be scaled by a •competent scaler by Doyle and Scribner’s…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon v. Cleveland Sawmill & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900