Brian Keith Tweedy and Sandra Tweedy v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Tweedy appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of TVA by the district court on the ground that Tweedy’s claims against TVA were barred by the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On November 15, 1984, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and Gilbert/Commonwealth, Inc. (Gilbert) entered into a staff augmentation contract wherein Gilbert agreed to provide “personnel to perform general engineering ... services related to TVA’s nuclear ... power plants in accordance with criteria, procedures, and scheduling requirements established by [TVA].” Under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Terry v. Read Steel ProductsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Pettaway v. Mobile Paint Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Marlow v. Mid South Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaut v. MedranoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Rhodes v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex parte Tenax Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Lewis v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Chaney v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.