Legal Opinion

Devillier v. Penrod Drilling Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 6, 1987No. Civ. A. No. B-85-223-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

In the case at bar, plaintiff Ray Devillier filed suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and under the general maritime laws of the United States, alleging that the injuries he sustained were caused by the defendant’s negligence and the unseaworthy conditions on board the defendant’s offshore drilling vessel. On September 5, 1986, judgment was entered in this cause by virtue of the jury’s verdict, whereby plaintiff was awarded $494,679.82 in damages (past and future), maintenance, cure, and prejudgment interest. On September 18, 1986, defendant filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Delano v. KitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Luke Joseph Perricone, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Intervenor-Appellee v. The Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Lester Langley v. Turner's Express, Incorporated, Marge Langley v. Turner's Express, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DSC Communications Corp. v. Next Level CommunicationsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API