Legal Opinion

39th-40th Corp. v. Port of New York Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

Defendant Port of New York Authority has moved to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds that it, as a governmental agency of the States of New York and New Jersey, enjoys a derivative sovereign immunity from suit and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The inclusion of a branch of the motion directed at the sufficiency of the complaint raises an “ objection * * * in point of law ” constituting a general appearance (Civ. Prac. Act, § 237) and, despite the statement of special appearance indorsed upon the notice of motion, subjects the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Porto Rico v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. De Simone v. Transportes Maritimos Do EstadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Estate of LaRoche v. DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Pointer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People ex rel. Hahn v. HainesNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API