Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 99-1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fairfield App. No. 99CA24. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed October 25,1999, at page 2:

“Is the odor of burnt-marijuana, alone, sufficient to provide probable cause to search a defendant’s motor vehicle?”

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-1855, State v. Moore, Fairfield App. No. 99CA24.

The conflict cases are State v. Younts (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 708, 637 N.E.2d 64; and State v. Haynes (July 19, 1996), Portage App.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. YountsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API