Legal Opinion

Shen Engineers v. Brighton

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 9, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00624Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION SHEN ENGINEERS, INC., a Utah MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Corporation, ORDER Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-00624 HCN DBP Vv. District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr RICHARD BRIGHTON, an individual, d/b/a BRIGHTON ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant. Plaintiff Shen Engineers, Inc. moves the court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 18.)' The motion is timely, it was filed on the last day to file for amended pleadings, and there has been no opposition filed. Leave to amend is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Food Basket, Inc. v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Aalco Construction Company, a Corporation, and Robert W. Sewell v. F. H. Linneman Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API