Legal Opinion

Sornberger v. Berggren

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for'Saunders county. Tried ■below before Post, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an- action of replevin to recover .a quantity of wheat, the answer being a general denial. A jury was waived by the parties, and the cause submitted to the court, which found in favor of the defendants. The principal objection is that the finding and judgment are,not supported by the evidence.

S. H. Sornberger, for the plaintiff, testified that in .the fall of 1875, he owned certain lands in Saunders county, among which ivas the southeast quarter and the south half - of the northeast quarter of section 29, town 15, range 8— *400the latter described land being 240 acres,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beach v. VandenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Jackson ex dem. Beekman v. FranceNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. BurtlessNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Monday v. O'NeilNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Jessen v. BlackardNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Story v. LangSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API