Legal Opinion

Keen v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 3, 1929No. Docket No. 22262PublishedCited by 7 opinions

A tax paid to the Republic of France by a citizen of the United States temporarily residing in France computed upon an estimated income of seven times the rental value of the residence occupied by him is an income tax within the meaning of section 222(a)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1921.

1Opinion of the Court

*1244OPINION.

Smith :

The question herein presented is whether the petitioner is mtitled to a credit against his income tax for 1923 of the tax paid by him in that year to the Republic of France. The respondent contends that the tax paid to the Republic of France is a property tax and not an income tax within the meaning of section 222(a) of the Revenue Act of 1921.

The case of this same petitioner was before the Board for the year 1921 in Herbert Ide Keen, 6 B. T. A. 275. In that case it was stipulated that the tax paid by the petitioner was an income tax and upon the basis of the stipulation the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. The American Metal Co., Limited, the American Metal Co., Limited v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Abbot Laboratories International Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  4. Havana Electric R., L. & P. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. Havana Elec. Ry., Light & Power Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API