Legal Opinion

Schepps v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1968No. 40895PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is being an accomplice to certain named principals in the commission of the offense of printing and making a counterfeit cigarette tax stamp; the punishment, seven years in the Department of Corrections.

*929Appellant’s first ground of error is that the court erred in overruling his exceptions to the fourth count of the indictment under which appellant was convicted. The indictment was drawn under Chapter 7 of Title 122A, V.A.T.S., “Cigarette Tax Law”. Article 7.38 of said chapter denounced the offense, to which appellant was charged as being an accomplice. It is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Henley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Wilder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Tezeno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Stiggers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API