Legal Opinion

Hookman v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered August 6, 1996, which, after a nonjury trial, found in favor of defendant hospital and against plaintiff resident, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Charles J. Hecht, P. C. v Clowes, 224 AD2d 312) supports the trial court’s credibility determination that defendant’s reasons for terminating plaintiffs residency, primarily clinical incompetence, were not a pretext for retaliation motivated by her complaints of illegally excessive hours in violation of 10 NYCRR 405.4 (b) (6). In any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bordell v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Hecht v. ClowesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blumenreich v. North Shore Health System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Lukose v. Long Island Medical Diagnostic Imaging, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Berde v. North Shore- Long Is. Jewish Health Sys., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API