People v. Mack
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from his plea-based conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305. Defendant pled nolo contendere to a charge of breaking and entering a dentist’s office at 2545 Baker Street in the City of Muskegon Heights with intent to commit larceny.
On appeal, defendant claims that an inadequate factual basis for his plea was presented. GCR 1963, 785.7(3)(b)(ii) requires a judge who takes a nolo plea to conduct a hearing (unless there has already been one) that establishes support for a finding that the defendant is guilty. No…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BarrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. BartlettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. WareMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. CannoyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984