Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rainey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 16, 1908No. 144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an appeal from a judgment on demurrer dismissing the appellant’s complaint. The prayer of the complaint is to have declared and foreclosed a mortgage lien on certain land as against the defendants, who also claim liens upon the same, and is based upon a written agreement set forth. This instrument recites that the appellant and William J. Rainey have bought the land for $18,000, in the proportions of two-thirds and one-third respectively, for the purpose of improving and selling it; that the whole consideration was paid in cash by the appellant, and that Rainey has agreed to repay the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luke v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Luke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bank of Arizona v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API