Legal Opinion

Georgia Casualty Co. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1930No. 698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeslie, J.

On February 26, 1929, James Madison Hill was employed as a helper or nurseryman by Ross R. Wolfe, who, as owner of a nursery, was a subscriber under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 8308-8309), by virtue of the terms of a policy insuring “nurserymen, — including drivers, chauffeurs and their helpers.” On that date, acting-under the directions of Wolfe and in his- immediate presence, Hill, while engaged in taking a heifer for breeding purposes to a male about one and one-half miles from the nursery or place of injury, and just as he passed with the animal from the nursery…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. BurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. HardieTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ginn v. Forest Nursery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Texas Employers Insurance Association v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API