Legal Opinion

Mancuso v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 16, 2001No. 93 Civ. 0001(WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

On January 4, 1993, Frank Mancuso (“Mancuso”) and his wife brought this action against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”), for personal injury to themselves and their children and for property damage in violation of the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or the “Act”), 33 U.S.C. § 1365, and New York State law. On December 12, 1994, Judge Broderick of this Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the property damage claims as time-barred. See Mancuso v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y, Inc., No. 93 Civ. 0001, 1994…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borough of Upper Saddle River v. Rockland County Sewer District 1District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Access 4 All, Inc. v. Trump International Hotel & Tower CondominiumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  4. Douglas v. District Council 37 Municipal Employees' Education Fund TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. CapassoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API