Legal Opinion

Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Rosenbloom

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1915No. 2364PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On motion for rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, C. J.

The opinion delivered in the case by the late Chief Justice Brown on the original hearing, in its statement of the ease, is corrected in the following particulars so as to conform to the findings of fact made by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals: At the time of Rosenbloom’s death a freight train of the plaintiff in error was leaving its yards in Amarillo upon track No. 4, moving out slowly upon the track. Just before his death Rosenbloom was walking between track No. 4 and track No. 5, immediately adjacent, in the same direction the train was moving. The Court of Civil Appeals has found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. CosioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Yellow Cab Co. v. PfefferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Houston Electric Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Abalos v. Oil Development Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API