Legal Opinion

Haussmann v. Colonial Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The action is one by a bondholder for damages sustained as a result of the cancellation of a lease.

The appellant was the lessee under an instrument executed in 1928 leasing the premises subsequently mortgaged. The mortgage and indenture, under which plaintiffs’ rights arise, were executed six months after the execution of the lease. The mortgage indenture provided that the mortgagor would perform all the obligations on the part of the landlord to be performed, and would enforce all obligations to be performed by lessees under any and all leases affecting the mortgaged property, “ to the lien…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haussmann v. Colonial Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API